Kyle speaks to Robert Reyvolt and John Kaminski, with a special appearance by Patricia Aiken. They
analyze the many angles and layers to the situation in Oregon, with a
particular focus on the murder and martyrdom of LaVoy Finicum.
Great show. Kyle, John Friend and Sinead are the only three really honest journalists I know of in the entire WN movement. I sent them all, plus Lenon Honor, Simon Shack and Germar Rudolf, big donations for the new year. They will go against WN agendas, 8 out of 10 times if the truth demands it. They will still also most likely be pressured by their supporters to sacrifice principles to agenda in the other 2 instances because they're only human beings, vulnerable and flawed and always learning, and that's where we come in, we under less pressure and sometimes able to think more freely, to let them know when they're being dis-honest and point them back in the right direction. Without these three, we have nothing connecting us so-called "conspiracy theoriests" to right wing movements. Reyvolt is great too but I'm not sure if he's officially WN or not. He might just be an anti-Judaic conspiracy-facts researcher like Kaminski, Aiken, Fetcho and the guys at Mami's.
The people who post at Kyle's site are another matter though. 70% are a bunch of close-minded mediocrities at best who do nothing all day but repeat WN mantras or trailer trash who consider all non-white people "subhuman" (like Lee Rogers has unfortunately turned into, a typical Andre-Anglin-Junior bigot with zero interest in the t-root, only agendas) at worst. lol
Out of spiritual growth and mental sovereignty comes every other benefit. Never forget that, whatever your allegorical references (religions) for metaphorically mapping the spiritual forest. Some people use H.L. Mencken and Nietzsche and Plato and Aristotle, others use Jesus, Mohammad and Buddah and L. Ron Hubbard, and some use all of these figures and archetypes, take the baby and leave the bathwater in each instance, whether or not they can be proven to have physically lived. Just remember also that the map is never the territory and symbols, not even mathematical symbols, can ever fully represent reality, only map it in more and more detail and balanced factors (equations).
"Religious feeling is therefore a character inherent in the very structure of the human mind, and is the expression of a need which must be recognized by the biologist as neither superficial nor transitory.
It must be admitted that some philosophers and men of science have at times denied to the religious impulses of man their true dignity and importance. Impelled perhaps by a desire to close the circle of a materialistic conception of the universe, they have tended to belittle the significance of such phenomena as they were unable to reconcile with their principles and bring within the iron circle of their doctrine.
To deal with religion in this way has not only been an outrage upon true scientific method, but has always led to a strong reaction in general opinion against any radical inquiry by science into the deeper problems of man's nature and status. A large and energetic reaction of this kind prevails to-day. There can be little doubt that it was precipitated, if not provoked, by attempts to force a harsh and dogmatic materialism into the status of a general philosophy.
As long as such a system is compelled to ignore, to depreciate, or to deny the reality of such manifestly important phenomena as the altruistic emotions, the religious needs and feelings, the experiences of awe and wonder and beauty, the illumination of the mystic, the rapture of the prophet, the unconquerable endurance of the martyr, so long must it fail in its claims to universality.
It is therefore necessary to lay down with the strongest emphasis the proposition that the religious needs and feelings of man are a direct and necessary manifestation of the inheritance of instinct with which he is born, and therefore deserve consideration as respectful and observation as minute as any other biological phenomenon."
-- "Instincts of the Herd in Peace and War," Wilfred Trotter, 1916
1 comment:
Great show. Kyle, John Friend and Sinead are the only three really honest journalists I know of in the entire WN movement. I sent them all, plus Lenon Honor, Simon Shack and Germar Rudolf, big donations for the new year. They will go against WN agendas, 8 out of 10 times if the truth demands it. They will still also most likely be pressured by their supporters to sacrifice principles to agenda in the other 2 instances because they're only human beings, vulnerable and flawed and always learning, and that's where we come in, we under less pressure and sometimes able to think more freely, to let them know when they're being dis-honest and point them back in the right direction. Without these three, we have nothing connecting us so-called "conspiracy theoriests" to right wing movements. Reyvolt is great too but I'm not sure if he's officially WN or not. He might just be an anti-Judaic conspiracy-facts researcher like Kaminski, Aiken, Fetcho and the guys at Mami's.
The people who post at Kyle's site are another matter though. 70% are a bunch of close-minded mediocrities at best who do nothing all day but repeat WN mantras or trailer trash who consider all non-white people "subhuman" (like Lee Rogers has unfortunately turned into, a typical Andre-Anglin-Junior bigot with zero interest in the t-root, only agendas) at worst. lol
Out of spiritual growth and mental sovereignty comes every other benefit. Never forget that, whatever your allegorical references (religions) for metaphorically mapping the spiritual forest. Some people use H.L. Mencken and Nietzsche and Plato and Aristotle, others use Jesus, Mohammad and Buddah and L. Ron Hubbard, and some use all of these figures and archetypes, take the baby and leave the bathwater in each instance, whether or not they can be proven to have physically lived. Just remember also that the map is never the territory and symbols, not even mathematical symbols, can ever fully represent reality, only map it in more and more detail and balanced factors (equations).
"Religious feeling is therefore a character inherent in the very structure of the human mind, and is the expression of a need which must be recognized by the biologist as neither superficial nor transitory.
It must be admitted that some philosophers and men of science have at times denied to the religious impulses of man their true dignity and importance. Impelled perhaps by a desire to close the circle of a materialistic conception of the universe, they have tended to belittle the significance of such phenomena as they were unable to reconcile with their principles and bring within the iron circle of their doctrine.
To deal with religion in this way has not only been an outrage upon true scientific method, but has always led to a strong reaction in general opinion against any radical inquiry by science into the deeper problems of man's nature and status. A large and energetic reaction of this kind prevails to-day. There can be little doubt that it was precipitated, if not provoked, by attempts to force a harsh and dogmatic materialism into the status of a general philosophy.
As long as such a system is compelled to ignore, to depreciate, or to deny the reality of such manifestly important phenomena as the altruistic emotions, the religious needs and feelings, the experiences of awe and wonder and beauty, the illumination of the mystic, the rapture of the prophet, the unconquerable endurance of the martyr, so long must it fail in its claims to universality.
It is therefore necessary to lay down with the strongest emphasis the proposition that the religious needs and feelings of man are a direct and necessary manifestation of the inheritance of instinct with which he is born, and therefore deserve consideration as respectful and observation as minute as any other biological phenomenon."
-- "Instincts of the Herd in Peace and War," Wilfred Trotter, 1916
http://archive.org/details/instinctsofherdi00trot
Post a Comment