Spot on analysis. The tooth movement has been infiltrated and is practically a complete jole with such ridiculous theories as flat earth sandy hook and this fakeology nonsense. Anyone who believes this shit should have their heads examined and if they promote it are highly suspectbas cass sunstein agents.
are 100% fake because you can't have both shadows and light on the same flat surface, facing in the same direction, in the same image at the same time, then that's not anybody else's problem, is it? That is your problem. You need to brush up on your understanding of photography, movies, special effects and reality. A shot like that is absolutely impossible as an authentic representation of reality from an authentic camera shot, digital or film. Therefore, the obvious conclusion is: it was constructed in a movie studio where the mistakes were made during the doctoring. Why "obvious conclusion"? Because these faked images aren't just "bait" put out there for suckers the way a Dallas Goldbug was, these kinds of doctored and faked imagery is ALL WE HAVE on 9/11. All aspects of the 9/11 image pool are FAR MORE than a litte problematic and faked, all the way down to the "3000 victims."
Are even HUNDREDS of similar images just on 9/11, still not enough to prove a media-fakery modus operandi, when any proper court would require ONLY ONE instance of a fully-proven fraud or fakery to throw the entire media's and governments' false testimony case of Moslems-Did-It-Because-They-Hate-Our-"Freedoms" (lol) out on its ass?
Unproven and completely off-the-wall "Flat-Earth" theorizing is most likely a PsyOp itself in order to turd up the punch-bowl of all Media-Fakery research. It has nothing to do with Sandy Hoax Media Fakery and 9/11 Media Fakery and Boston Marathon Media Fakery and a myriad of others including the Norway "Shootings," all of which are CONCLUSIVELY and I mean 100% proven to be done with techniques of Media-Fakery and not Government-Agent False-Flag "murders" of any real people. Just because someone like Delcroix or John le Bon is "Ball Earth Skeptic" and researches in those shill-infested waters doesn't mean that they are deliberate shills themselves. One thing is for sure, NASA cannot be trusted and is a proven fraud. However, just because NASA is an obvious fraud, this doesn't invalidate all the valid science that NASA is distorting and misrepresenting for the agendas of the elite.
I personally agree with Simon Shack and Chris Kendall that the earth is likely round and rotating at a 1 mile per hour CIRCULAR rather than spherical orbit and the planets are in binary relation to each other, because otherwise the extremely detailed nautical maps and such, based on a globe-earth model would not work and people traveling would not be able to reach any location accurately or accomplish much of anything. Also, and very obviously, unless someone can explain why the stars rotate counter-clockwise in the southern hemisphere and clockwise in the North, the earth is likely round and that's that.
And by the way, RedSilverJ IS more-or-less a Media-Fakery analyst. So you're appreciating the "spot-on" analysis of a guy who believes most "False-Flags" are done as Media-Faked PsyOps, the exact opposite of what you believe, regardless of even a mountain of evidence placed in front of you, so the FIRST PERSON whose "head" you should examine is RedSilverJ himself, not anybody else. lol
3 comments:
Spot on analysis. The tooth movement has been infiltrated and is practically a complete jole with such ridiculous theories as flat earth sandy hook and this fakeology nonsense. Anyone who believes this shit should have their heads examined and if they promote it are highly suspectbas cass sunstein agents.
Stop trying to broad-brush all Media-Fakery research as one and the same. If you don't understand that these 2 images
http://k007.kiwi6.com/hotlink/xz7nxm2ha6/Simon_Shack_SUNdoesnotlie.jpg
http://k007.kiwi6.com/hotlink/2a2eluawyv/000_Shack_GAMMAPRESSvsSEAN_ADAIR.jpg
are 100% fake because you can't have both shadows and light on the same flat surface, facing in the same direction, in the same image at the same time, then that's not anybody else's problem, is it? That is your problem. You need to brush up on your understanding of photography, movies, special effects and reality. A shot like that is absolutely impossible as an authentic representation of reality from an authentic camera shot, digital or film. Therefore, the obvious conclusion is: it was constructed in a movie studio where the mistakes were made during the doctoring. Why "obvious conclusion"? Because these faked images aren't just "bait" put out there for suckers the way a Dallas Goldbug was, these kinds of doctored and faked imagery is ALL WE HAVE on 9/11. All aspects of the 9/11 image pool are FAR MORE than a litte problematic and faked, all the way down to the "3000 victims."
http://forum.davidicke.com/showthread.php?t=224648&page=7
Are even HUNDREDS of similar images just on 9/11, still not enough to prove a media-fakery modus operandi, when any proper court would require ONLY ONE instance of a fully-proven fraud or fakery to throw the entire media's and governments' false testimony case of Moslems-Did-It-Because-They-Hate-Our-"Freedoms" (lol) out on its ass?
http://everything2.com/title/falsus+in+uno%252C+falsus+in+omnibus
Unproven and completely off-the-wall "Flat-Earth" theorizing is most likely a PsyOp itself in order to turd up the punch-bowl of all Media-Fakery research. It has nothing to do with Sandy Hoax Media Fakery and 9/11 Media Fakery and Boston Marathon Media Fakery and a myriad of others including the Norway "Shootings," all of which are CONCLUSIVELY and I mean 100% proven to be done with techniques of Media-Fakery and not Government-Agent False-Flag "murders" of any real people. Just because someone like Delcroix or John le Bon is "Ball Earth Skeptic" and researches in those shill-infested waters doesn't mean that they are deliberate shills themselves. One thing is for sure, NASA cannot be trusted and is a proven fraud. However, just because NASA is an obvious fraud, this doesn't invalidate all the valid science that NASA is distorting and misrepresenting for the agendas of the elite.
I personally agree with Simon Shack and Chris Kendall that the earth is likely round and rotating at a 1 mile per hour CIRCULAR rather than spherical orbit and the planets are in binary relation to each other, because otherwise the extremely detailed nautical maps and such, based on a globe-earth model would not work and people traveling would not be able to reach any location accurately or accomplish much of anything. Also, and very obviously, unless someone can explain why the stars rotate counter-clockwise in the southern hemisphere and clockwise in the North, the earth is likely round and that's that.
And by the way, RedSilverJ IS more-or-less a Media-Fakery analyst. So you're appreciating the "spot-on" analysis of a guy who believes most "False-Flags" are done as Media-Faked PsyOps, the exact opposite of what you believe, regardless of even a mountain of evidence placed in front of you, so the FIRST PERSON whose "head" you should examine is RedSilverJ himself, not anybody else. lol
Post a Comment