Below are relevant links for this program:
Show-page
- Official Dr. Day website
- Who is Dr. Lorraine Day?
- The Good News About God
- Dr. Day interview on ITV (video)
Download
Sunday, February 14, 2016
The Realist Report with John Friend 2/9/2016
Below are relevant links for this program:
Show-page
Download
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
5 comments:
With regard to Day's old-school "square" dislike of my all-time favorite product from the plant kingdom, SWEET LEAF:
“There are two modes of existence — two modes of life — given to man,” Moreau mused. “The first one results from our communication with the external world, with the universe. The second one is but the reflection of the self and is fed from its own distinct internal sources. The dream is an in-between land where the external life ends and the internal life begins.” — With the aid of hashish, he felt that anyone could enter this in-between land at will. — E. Abel, “Marihuana: The first Twelve Thousand Years”
http://druglibrary.org/schaffer/hemp/history/first12000/abel.htm
http://www.ukcia.org/research/abel/12.php
Understanding Marijuana, A New Look At the Scientific Evidence by Mitch Earleywine
http://priede.bf.lu.lv/grozs/AuguFiziologijas/Augu_resursu_biologija/gramatas/Understanding%20Marijuana.pdf
HOW and WHY does Cannabis Cure Cancer – Scientific Explanation
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DttdDOqQMuY
And here's how to use it without having to burn anything or receive any carcinogens whatsoever:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pr7VCEHS9F4
7 temperatures - made in Australia, one of the highest quality electronic products I've ever bought. E-bay has the best prices for these (around $120)
No hangovers, Best sleep you ever had, No grinding, no clean up (except washing the pipes), plus the newer models all work while charging so you can stay high 24 hours a day. lol
And I mean HIGHHHH. lol One hit of that bastard puts you on cloud 9 but you don't realize it because you're not choking on all the carcinogens from a smoke or a bong hit. A bong hit will still get your more screwed up because it cuts the oxygen off to your head but "screwed-up" is operative word. Do you really want to be screwed up or do you want to be high, happy, relaxed, balanced and functional? Relaxed, balanced and functional is the way to go.
Also, none of the above applies if a person is still drinking or smoking nicotine on a daily basis. Those two drugs do more damage and destruction in any given decade than Pot has done in all its history.
Nuns Fight to Keep their Marijuana Business:
http://abc30.com/politics/merced-nuns-fight-to-keep-their-marijuana-based-business/1143619/
Article by Jan Irvin on Vegans and Animal Rights Activists:
Jan Irvin
December 22, 2014 ·
As someone who would have been the 4th generation veterinarian in my family if I had chosen to, I'm becoming more and more disturbed by what is claimed to be "Animal Rights" activism, et al.
Though my father, grandfather and great grandfather were all veterinarians, they all had land for cattle and/or pigs, chickens, ducks, turkeys, and they ate them, too, they all loved and took care of animals - and more often than not, saved their lives.
When we understand the ketogenic high fat/ high cholesterol diet, etc, we begin to see the real gravitas of what these PETA / Animal rights activists (and vegans) promote... and, like feminism, the psychedelic revolution etc, this too seems to be run by agents and con artists.
It seems to me that the obvious agenda of these animal rights activists, who obviously rely on statism/socialism for their goals, is not to raise animals up to the level of humans, but to bring humans down to the level of animals.
It should be obvious to anyone with half a brain that the ethical treatment of animals is simply in our own best interests. If we raise animals properly, pasture them, etc, then they give us the best health benefits - in the form of their meat, milk, eggs, et al. This doesn't need communism, or socialism, or statism of any form. It requires only basic common sense. Factory farming isn't wrong because animals need rights, it's wrong because it not only poisons the animals, but us too.
There's a pattern that I notice to many of these animal rights groups and activists.
1) They're too often fat starved, gaunt vegans selling that they're spiritually enlightened while putting everyone else down who's seen through the lies.
2) They nearly always use the moral superiority complex fallacy to make their claims.
3) They use all sorts of emotional pulls to draw you in - "I don't eat things with a face - therefore I'm better / more spiritual than you".
4) They avoid issues like the ketogenic diet and that the brain and reproductive system are 77% cholesterol and burn saturated fats. Gee! You think there's something to look at here?!
5) They sell lies that veganism is a healthy diet.
6) They conflate and confuse factory farming with ranchers/hunters.
7) Ranchers and hunters who go out and do their own, really connecting with nature, are belittled and put down.
8) They're most often bereft of children - and have over-cared-for pets substituting for their lack of family.
9) They typically care for animals more than they do for any human being.
This leads me to the conclusion that the real agenda is all about controlling the human diet. If they can give animals rights, then humans will no longer have the right to ranch, hunt, farm, etc, and then our entire food chain is in peril. These socialists would destroy our very existence - because we would only be able to maintain glycolysis - which, as we can see around us, is the most destructive thing ever. Ketosis is the state of good health. Glycolysis is a state of emergency and famine - and long term it becomes obesity, diabetes, IBS, cancer, and a total breakdown of the body's system.
(continued . . . )
As an example, and this is but one: a childless, lesbian, feminist, vegetarian once told me while she was on psychedelics that it's better to let a child die than to ever do any form of animal experiment. She was so compassionate that she had no compassion at all - for human life. At least she was the end to her own means.
Furthermore, animal rights activists and vegetarians / vegans both - ignore that farming soy, huge farm crops, etc, is far more destructive on the environment than cattle ever were - imagine the 30 million bison that used to roam the plains free, for instance.
Farming with trackers kills all the local wildlife, including birds, reptiles, insects and most smaller mammals. In reality, as I discussed in my interview a few years ago with Daniella Martin "Not Eating Insects is Dumb," the vegetarian diet, aside from lack of ketosis, is a joke in regards to being "healthy" on the environment. And besides, the average vegetarian / vegan takes in a huge amount of insect protein, or they wouldn't last half as long as they do.
But we see so-called environmentalists promoting this crap, the so-called spiritually enlightened, et al., and it's not environmental, it's not spiritually enlightened. It's socialism, eugenics, ill-health, and FAR more destructive on the environment.
See also Cows Save The Planet.
Go out into nature and observe: There is NO life without death. On every level, every organism and every animal eats something else that was ALIVE. Plants eat animals, animals eat plants. Just because plants don't have a face doesn't mean that you're not killing HUGE amounts of wildlife. And, in fact, most ranchers and hunters can count the exact number of animals they've killed in one year - on one hand.
When you see these types, call them out. Expose their lies, their fraud. End the madness.
Recovering Vegans:
http://alexandrajamieson.com/im-not-vegan-anymore/
P.S. Note "Animal Rights Activist" or being an anti-Animal-Cruelty activist is not the same thing, of course. Animals have the right to not be treated cruelly. All decent human beings agree on that. But they don't have the right not to be eaten for food.
P.P.S. It's DYS-genics that's harmful Jan, Not EU-genics. Eu-genics is when you pick the healthiest, smartest and best looking mate you can get given what you have to offer in return made into a systematic study. If it's not forced or indirectly forced through subconscious propaganda, then there is nothing really wrong with it. The people who want to heed those discoveries can benefit from them and those who don't will continue to produce more and more unhealthy offspring etc. Just like U-topia vs DYS-topia or Eu-stress (good stress to grow) vs. DIS-stress (unchosen and unnecessary stress).
Post a Comment