There is zero contact info for "Fake News Now", I wanted to contact them, but there is no contact info so:
It is ironic that "Fake News Now" leads off the show with some "fake news" of their own: https://corporationnationradioarchives.wordpress.com/2017/03/26/the-alternative-media-is-at-it-again/
How sad is it that no-one in the alternative media ever checks their sources?
When I first heard the Rocky Quote - >>“We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost 40 years>> etc. My mind said: This is too good to be true.. so I investigated the source.
It's a shame that I'm the only one who does that.
Okay - You say I'm full of shit: This Youtube was all the rage 4 months ago: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YfRtbIQ1kTw&authuser=0 I was sent this by many "truthiness hosts" .. and once again.. "It sounds too good to be true" .. so I investigate: It is a complete hoax .. the audio is contextually altered (changed) to say something completely different.
I warned many hosts about this video being a hoax, but they ran with it anyway.
"TRUTH" doesn't have a place in alternative media, because the majority of the hosts are "repeaters", not researchers.
How sad is that?
Apparently, I'm the only one who cares about "truthiness", so go on wallow in Your "truth"!
.jpg)
1 comment:
There is zero contact info for "Fake News Now", I wanted to contact them, but there is no contact info so:
It is ironic that "Fake News Now" leads off the show with some "fake news" of their own: https://corporationnationradioarchives.wordpress.com/2017/03/26/the-alternative-media-is-at-it-again/
How sad is it that no-one in the alternative media ever checks their sources?
When I first heard the Rocky Quote - >>“We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost 40 years>> etc. My mind said: This is too good to be true.. so I investigated the source.
It's a shame that I'm the only one who does that.
Okay - You say I'm full of shit: This Youtube was all the rage 4 months ago: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YfRtbIQ1kTw&authuser=0 I was sent this by many "truthiness hosts" .. and once again.. "It sounds too good to be true" .. so I investigate: It is a complete hoax .. the audio is contextually altered (changed) to say something completely different.
I warned many hosts about this video being a hoax, but they ran with it anyway.
"TRUTH" doesn't have a place in alternative media, because the majority of the hosts are "repeaters", not researchers.
How sad is that?
Apparently, I'm the only one who cares about "truthiness", so go on wallow in Your "truth"!
Post a Comment